Summary

EoP RH FR Updates:

Date = Setup or Last Updated with New Info.  [CU: Date] = Update of content of prior posting.

Content Updates:

.

Factual Evidentiary or Language Accuracy Corrections to EoP RH FR Principles:

Correspondence received by EoP MILED Clerk; from any individual with evidentiary information detailing any error of fact or logic in EoP RH FR principles; shall be documented under EoP RH FR Correspondence; and EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality principles shall be amended for correction or greater accuracy; if evidence so requires. EoP MILED Clerk Ecology of Peace communication practices are detailed at: EoP RH Culture Info: Eco & Egological Literacy.

Contacting EoP Acting Clerk:
Email: eop.miled.clerk@gmail.com.
Landmail: PO Box 5042, George East, 6539, RSA.

 

Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality:

  1. Earth is not flat.
  2. Resources are finite.
  3. When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletion and resource conflict.
  4. Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources include: poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc.
  5. The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits is the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the Masonic War is Peace international law social contract.
  6. If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations sincerely – aka egological literacy – want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate to nullify the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses and replace them with Ecology of Peace clauses that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool.

.

Cooperating to Implement an EoP Intnl Law Social Contract

.
There are many ways to cooperate; such as for example:

Sincere Honourable Critic:

Sincere – aka ego literate – constructive criticism to expose errors in EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality principles. If the EoP RH FR principles are in error, the sooner they are proven so; the sooner they can be amended or discarded as incorrect.

EoP RH FR Advocacy & Socio-Cultural Practice:

Engage in Advocacy – educating others and yourself, including through socio-cultural practice of the issues you are educating others on –of EoP Scientific & Cultural Law; Eco & Egological Literacy; on your path towards being confident about your capability to sign and uphold your Responsible Freedom oath.

Ego and Ecological Literacy Socio-Cultural Arbitrators and Jury Practice:

Advocacy and education of ecologically and egologically literate arbitrators and/or jury members will enable your community to quickly, amicably and impartially resolve resource disputes, outside of current or impending WiP Legal Matchstick Bridge collapse court proceedings; saving your resources to enable other benefits for your community.

If you want to appoint another Current or Former EoP Applicant, whom you have greater respect for gender, racial or religious reasonable impartiality or fairness to yourself, than myself; to act as a jury member on your behalf; whose feedback I shall be happy to consider, on your behalf, include such jury members name, in writing, including a written request to them to act in a jury capacity on behalf of yourself, with regard to these allegations. If they consent, they shall be required to voluntarily – under oath, in writing, in accordance with ego literate values – answer any and all questions related to their acquittal, conviction or sentencing jury decision-making from yourself or myself, that you or I consider relevant; related to these allegations against yourself.

If your preferred alternative jury member is not a Current or Former EoP Applicant, they shall need to provide you and me with a written statement, that they shall hold themselves accountable to voluntarily – under oath, in writing, in accordance with ego literate values – answer any and all questions related to their acquittal, conviction or sentencing jury decision-making from yourself or myself, that you or I consider relevant; related to these allegations against yourself.
– EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 22 Feb:  HR McMaster, E Prince: #2 Notice re: Accused War Criminals in ICC Complaint.

Support Legal Certainty Confirmation:

If you sincerely believe EoP RH FR principles to be accurate, advocacy and support for their legal certainty confirmation as legal observable factual reality, either in your own nation or by supporting the EoP NTE GMA Potus cabinet to be implemented.

Strategic Use of your Acquired Scarcity Combatant Resources:

Use your scarcity combatant acquired resources to support EoP STRATINT; such as for example:

According to [the EoP EcoFootprint] legal definition, Vladimir Putin, Barack Obama, Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Erik Prince, Rex Tillerson’s procreation and consumption eco-footprint would qualify them for ‘scarcity combatant’ war criminal convictions.

Necessity Nullification of War Criminal Conviction or Mitigation of Sentencing:

To the extent that the accused – Vladimir Putin, Barack Obama, Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Erik Prince, or Rex Tillerson – proved that he used his ‘scarcity combatant’ aquired resources to cooperate to change the course of his nation or the Planet’s Ship of State, towards a focus of removing the military, legal, religious, academic, etc obstacles obstructing the implementation of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract for his nation and the planet; his scarcity combatant war criminal conviction would be nullified by the principle of objective and/or subjective political or military necessity.

To the extent that the Prosecutor proved that the accused – Vladimir Putin, Barack Obama, Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Erik Prince, or Rex Tillerson – used his ‘scarcity combatant’ war criminal resources to (i) negligently or consciously and/or deliberately obstruct the implementation of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; he would be convicted, and sentenced to (ii) re-education classes on any of the egological or ecological literacy issues he was illiterate about, resulting in his negligent actions; or (ii) elimination from the planetary genepool, according to his state assisted suicide preference.

To the extent that my observations and interpretations are proven accurate by evidence:

Vladimir Putin & Barack Obama would be found Innocent; Erik Prince, Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Rex Tillerson would be convicted as negligent and/or consciously deliberate scarcity combatant war criminals.
– EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 19 Jan: M Rubio, R Tillerson: EoP RH Factual Reality and War Criminal Questions

There are many more ways to cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract. Hopefully some of the aforementioned ideas are helpful for individuals wondering how they can cooperate to support the implementation of an EoP social contract to enable orderly and humane depopulation and deindustrialization.