Cooperating to Implement an EoP Intnl Law Social Contract
There are many ways to cooperate; such as for example:
Sincere Honourable Critic:
Sincere – aka ego literate – constructive criticism to expose errors in EoP Radical Honoursty Factual Reality principles. If the EoP RH FR principles are in error, the sooner they are proven so; the sooner they can be amended or discarded as incorrect.
EoP RH FR Advocacy & Socio-Cultural Practice:
Engage in Advocacy – educating others and yourself, including through socio-cultural practice of the issues you are educating others on –of EoP Scientific & Cultural Law; Eco & Egological Literacy; on your path towards being confident about your capability to sign and uphold your Responsible Freedom oath.
Ego and Ecological Literacy Socio-Cultural Arbitrators and Jury Practice:
Advocacy and education of ecologically and egologically literate arbitrators and/or jury members will enable your community to quickly, amicably and impartially resolve resource disputes, outside of current or impending WiP Legal Matchstick Bridge collapse court proceedings; saving your resources to enable other benefits for your community.
If you want to appoint another Current or Former EoP Applicant, whom you have greater respect for gender, racial or religious reasonable impartiality or fairness to yourself, than myself; to act as a jury member on your behalf; whose feedback I shall be happy to consider, on your behalf, include such jury members name, in writing, including a written request to them to act in a jury capacity on behalf of yourself, with regard to these allegations. If they consent, they shall be required to voluntarily – under oath, in writing, in accordance with ego literate values – answer any and all questions related to their acquittal, conviction or sentencing jury decision-making from yourself or myself, that you or I consider relevant; related to these allegations against yourself.
If your preferred alternative jury member is not a Current or Former EoP Applicant, they shall need to provide you and me with a written statement, that they shall hold themselves accountable to voluntarily – under oath, in writing, in accordance with ego literate values – answer any and all questions related to their acquittal, conviction or sentencing jury decision-making from yourself or myself, that you or I consider relevant; related to these allegations against yourself.
– EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 22 Feb: HR McMaster, E Prince: #2 Notice re: Accused War Criminals in ICC Complaint.
Support Legal Certainty Confirmation:
If you sincerely believe EoP RH FR principles to be accurate, advocacy and support for their legal certainty confirmation as legal observable factual reality, either in your own nation or by supporting the EoP NTE GMA Potus cabinet to be implemented.
Strategic Use of your Acquired Scarcity Combatant Resources:
Use your scarcity combatant acquired resources to support EoP STRATINT; such as for example:
According to [the EoP EcoFootprint] legal definition, Vladimir Putin, Barack Obama, Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Erik Prince, Rex Tillerson’s procreation and consumption eco-footprint would qualify them for ‘scarcity combatant’ war criminal convictions.
Necessity Nullification of War Criminal Conviction or Mitigation of Sentencing:
To the extent that the accused – Vladimir Putin, Barack Obama, Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Erik Prince, or Rex Tillerson – proved that he used his ‘scarcity combatant’ aquired resources to cooperate to change the course of his nation or the Planet’s Ship of State, towards a focus of removing the military, legal, religious, academic, etc obstacles obstructing the implementation of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract for his nation and the planet; his scarcity combatant war criminal conviction would be nullified by the principle of objective and/or subjective political or military necessity.
To the extent that the Prosecutor proved that the accused – Vladimir Putin, Barack Obama, Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Erik Prince, or Rex Tillerson – used his ‘scarcity combatant’ war criminal resources to (i) negligently or consciously and/or deliberately obstruct the implementation of an Ecology of Peace international law social contract; he would be convicted, and sentenced to (ii) re-education classes on any of the egological or ecological literacy issues he was illiterate about, resulting in his negligent actions; or (ii) elimination from the planetary genepool, according to his state assisted suicide preference.
To the extent that my observations and interpretations are proven accurate by evidence:
Vladimir Putin & Barack Obama would be found Innocent; Erik Prince, Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Rex Tillerson would be convicted as negligent and/or consciously deliberate scarcity combatant war criminals.
– EoP v WiP NWO Neg: 19 Jan: M Rubio, R Tillerson: EoP RH Factual Reality and War Criminal Questions
There are many more ways to cooperate to implement an Ecology of Peace international law social contract. Hopefully some of the aforementioned ideas are helpful for individuals wondering how they can cooperate to support the implementation of an EoP social contract to enable orderly and humane depopulation and deindustrialization.